🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to implement a redrawn congressional map that may create up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to overturn a federal judge's block that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disturbing the sensitive federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its decision.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to use the maps established after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Strong Dissent

Through a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's decision. She stated that it disregarded the work of the lower court, noting that its decision was crafted by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a infraction of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Battle

The ruling occurs during a national battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican majority. Typically, boundary revision occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to proceed with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, for their part, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes aligned with Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

Conversely, Democratic officials decried the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another top House figure stated the court had once again shredded its credibility by approving a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.